By Dave Cunliffe, Chamber of Commerce President
(this is an excerpt from his Kicker article for April ’17)
As I wrote last month, I am personally a member of the incorporation committee. The Chamber resolved to take a neutral position on the issue but did agree to help with getting out information to the community. As a result, our web page has been used to post information and all North Shuswap residents are encouraged to view it.
A meeting was held on March 16th between the incorporation committee and our local government represented by Director Morgan, the chief administrative officer, the managers of development services, financial services, and operations.
It was made clear that there is no support for an incorporation study. The reasons given were that incorporation isn’t financially feasible, there has been mounting opposition from the public, staff is too busy, and that the senior managers are willing to work with the group to address how concerns can be addressed within the current regional district model.
There was no recognition that the 240 letters in favour of a study were a legitimate expression of support. There were comments that only 80 of the letters were from Scotch Creek and that the opinions of other residents of the North Shuswap shouldn’t have any bearing. It was pointed out that Scotch Creek was identified as the primary settlement area in our official community plan and the health of Scotch Creek is vital to the overall health of the entire North Shuswap.
So, what did the meeting accomplish?
First, our regional government is willing to move forward with developing a grant application for the start of a community water system in Scotch Creek. The incorporation group has prepared a conceptual plan to bring water service to the west side of Scotch Creek and given it to operations management. The next round of grants from the provincial and federal government is in March 2018 so we have a timeline to work with.
The manager of development services is willing to meet with representatives of the group to look at the issue of how regulations can be streamlined to speed up approvals for things like building and development permits. The meeting is scheduled for April 6th.
The chief administrative officer also suggested that we bring a delegation to the board to talk about our concerns for the future of Scotch Creek and how we think the board can be more responsive to our needs.
Our local government representatives have heard what our concerns are and have made commitments to try to address them. The group will work with local government to see if positive change can be affected and we appreciate the opportunity. After all, the motivation to examine incorporation is being driven by a desire to see Scotch Creek prosper.
And the next question, is the move to have an incorporation study carried out dead in the water? I don’t think so.
I believe we still need to have the study done so residents can make an informed choice as to whether incorporation makes any sense. The chief administrative officer suggested we look at the recently completed Salt Spring Island incorporation study. It can be found at http://www.ssiincorporationstudy.com/final-report/ .
It was a good suggestion and I’ve included an outline of the report.
Section 1 provides an introduction to the Report, including a description of What Prompted this Study, its purpose, the geographical boundary of the area included, the Study Committee and process, and key considerations used in the financial analysis.
Section 2 provides a profile of Salt Spring Island, including basic information on population, housing, property assessment, economy and labour force, agriculture, environmental protection and green space, publicly owned assets, and sense of community.
Section 3 provides an overview of the current governance system.
Section 4 presents the potential changes to representation and decision-making if Salt Spring Island were to incorporate.
Section 5 provides a detailed review of potential changes to service delivery and cost impacts if Salt Spring Island were to incorporate. Risks and opportunities are identified for each service under each form of governance. For each of 23 services, the information is presented in a summary format (which also attached to the Executive Summary) followed by a detailed explanation of key elements.
Section 6 reviews potential changes to government revenue if Salt Spring Island were to incorporate.
Section 7 identifies the consolidated financial impacts of municipal incorporation.
Section 8 identifies potential changes to property taxation if Salt Spring Island were to incorporate and provides the projected tax impacts of municipal incorporation.
Section 9 examines the risks, opportunities and uncertainties (or variable factors) associated with both the current governance system and the incorporation option.
Section 10 reviews the process of creating a new municipality, should Salt Spring Island choose to incorporate.
These are the same questions that most people have about what the incorporation of Scotch Creek might mean. I think it’s important not to lose sight of the fact that the request to local government was only to support a study, not to incorporate Scotch Creek.
Tell us what you think at http://scotchcreekbc.ca/
Or comment below…